[Json-rpc-java] project management approach

[ant elder]

As an ASF member I obviously favour the Apache approach :)

Not sure what difference is being suggested between 3, 3a, and 3b, surely
you want as many active committers as possible so everyone who has
experience developing the code should be eligible, so its just "apache style
consensus based approach" - all committers get a voice and full access.

   ...ant

On 9/27/07, Michael Clark <michael at metaparadigm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just another item I wanted to ping you all about.
>
> What style of project management would you prefer for the project going
> forward:
>
> 1 current benevolent dictator (who has been too busy of late to make
> releases but has made a damm good library)
> 2 new benevolent dictator (we've all read the posting)
> 3 apache style consensus based approach with 2 or more committers with
> full access
> 3a including the original author
> 3b censure of the original author (he is too slow to respond too emails
> or somesuch :)
>
> My vote is for 3a.
>
> Please send votes to the list (so I can't doctor the results :) and so
> that we have gone through the effort of some sort of consensus process
> with the users). Please pipe up.
>
> Michael.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Json-rpc-java mailing list
> Json-rpc-java at oss.metaparadigm.com
> http://oss.metaparadigm.com/mailman/listinfo/json-rpc-java
>